20 May 2015
_______________________________________
We have
to help the Rohingya refugees who are at the time of writing hanging on
precariously to life in the ocean. To do anything less will be cruel and
inhuman.
I don’t
buy any of the excuses made for not helping them. The one mainly used by the
government is that they are a security threat. Just how they are a security
threat is a mystery to me. That has not been properly explained at all. Perhaps
there is a fear of floodgates opening and that if we show compassion for this
lot, then others will come swarming in.
That is a
flawed argument because it works on the premise that people come to Malaysia
because our country is so great that they can’t help but want to come here. It
does not take into consideration that people only leave their homes in a manner
which risks all their belongings and even their lives, because they are forced
to.
If anyone
were to investigate even slightly into the conditions of life for the Rohingya
in Myanmar; the lack of legal recognition by their own government; the physical
attacks by the majority community; the terrible camps into which they are
forced to live; then it becomes obvious that when they leave it is out of
desperation and not a simple matter of seeking greener pastures.
Many
other criticisms also don’t hold water. The idea that immigrants cause crime
does not match the statistics which show that there is in no way a
proportionately high number of crimes being committed by foreign nationals. And
the fear that they bring disease is just a prejudice based on their general
poverty. The H1NI flu that attacked this region did not come from refugees but
moneyed travellers who came by aeroplane. We don’t see that stopping us from
accepting international flights into our country.
Much has
already been said about the obligations Malaysia has under international
customary law (we have a responsibility to give basic aid to refugees) and also
the need to just show a bit of common decency to people who are literally dying
off our shores. So what I wish to discuss here is why we came to this situation
in the first place. The Rohingya situation came about because the Myanmar
government has treated them appallingly. That is the bottom line. The bulk of
the responsibility of course rests there.
However
Myanmar is part of ASEAN and what is ASEAN’s responsibility here? What has
ASEAN done to stop the situation from reaching this level? I would argue very
little or nothing.
ASEAN’s
much protected principle of non-interference is said to have kept the peace in
the region for decades. But taken too far, it could create terrible situations;
like the one we have now. By simply allowing the Myanmar regime to continue
their policies with the Rohingyas, and not intervening in any way so as to
uphold the principle of non-interference, ASEAN has allowed a national issue
become an international problem.
ASEAN has
been (mostly) highly reluctant to truly take on board the ideals of human
rights. Many of the nations have no wish to practice it and even less to try to
get it respected in their neighbours’ jurisdictions. The result is the crisis
we are facing now. By not respecting the human rights of the Rohingyas and by
not insisting that the Myanmar government does the same in the first place,
ASEAN has inadvertently created a humanitarian crisis.
No comments:
Post a Comment